Clean-Up
Experts Rush to Serbian Nuke Site
July 27, 2006 5:35 AM
VINCA, Serbia-The Vinca reactor stands still, its decrepit innards purged
of their unused weapons-grade fuel. But it remains Serbia's little shop
of nuclear horrors, and a potential magnet for terrorists.
That makes it representative of the next step in the world's quest to
lift the threat of nuclear material falling into the wrong hands, first
by taking control of the fuel that makes atomic bombs, and now by tackling
the lesser but still potent menace of a dirty bomb, meaning radiation spread
by blowing up radioactive material with conventional explosives.
At the Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences outside Belgrade, there are
only a few armed guards in sight, and the barbed-wire fence around the
48-acre facility is only as tall as a man.
For would-be terrorists, "it's almost like a candy store," says Mike
Durst, the International Atomic Energy Agency's point man working to strip
Vinca of its attraction to nuclear thieves.
These fears are driving international agendas. Presidents Bush and Vladimir
Putin used a summit of the world's richest countries earlier this month
to launch the "Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism," which calls
for better accounting and protection of the Vincas of the world, scattered
around the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa.
The new program is meant to build on others created by the Bush administration,
including the 3-year old "Global Threat Reduction Initiative" to deal with
a broad range of vulnerable nuclear and radiological materials around the
world.
Most of the existing programs focus on unused weapons-grade fuel, nearly
100 pounds of which lay in Vinca until four years ago, when Washington,
Moscow and Belgrade mounted a joint operation to remove it.
Helicopters and 1,200 heavily armed troops including snipers were deployed
along with decoy trucks to thwart potential mischief-makers. Half of Belgrade
was sealed off, and within six hours, the fuel, enough to make at least
two simple nuclear warheads, was trucked from Vinca to the airport and
onward to a Russian government plant about 470 miles east of Moscow.
But that still leaves dozens of other badly secured and dangerous nuclear
facilities to deal with.
Inside the Vinca reactor building, 8,000 spent fuel rods sit in pools
of brackish water. Dozens contain uranium in varying degrees of enrichment,
potential dirty bomb material, not to mention the environmental hazard.
The bomb-worthy material is not uranium, but its highly radioactive
byproducts. These would quickly kill any terrorist who was not equipped
with protective suits, robotic arms and tons of lead to encase the stolen
material.
Still, research reactors such as Vinca tend to be less heavily protected
than power plants, and experts like Durst fear terrorists shown willing
to sacrifice their lives in other situations might do so as well to secure
the material. And while building a full-blown nuclear device is technologically
daunting, terrorists could easily use the material such as that in the
rods to construct a dirty bomb.
With just one dirty bomb, "you could hit Broadway, and you couldn't
decontaminate it for years," says Obrad Sotic, Vinca's former operations
manager.
And there are concerns other than raids on Vinca. While no nuclear material
is known to have gone missing employees speak openly of the potential temptations
of selling some on the black market as a way supplementing monthly incomes
of less than $750.
There's a lot to steal, old medical and industrial equipment, and tons
of material inside the reactor or in two rickety corrugated metal sheds.
There are bags of irradiated grass, containers of depleted uranium ammunition
fired by NATO during its 1999 Kosovo campaign, and several tons of yellowcake,
processed uranium ore of the kind Iran plans to process and enrich in what
the U.S. says is an attempt to make nuclear arms.
The Serbian Science Ministry, which is responsible for Vinca, has a
budget of less than $90 million for this year. That wouldn't cover the
cost of upgrading security, shipping the spent fuel back to Russia and
dismantling the reactor.
A centrally monitored alarm system is being installed and police will
be tasked with security under a plan being worked out under IAEA guidance.
Also foreseen is the shipment of the spent fuel to Russia and building
safer storage facilities for the collected nuclear junk. The ultimate goal
is to dismantle of the reactor and other parts of the facility.
But again, money is a problem.
Sending the spent fuel back to Russia will cost around $10 million,
and more money is needed to reprocess the fuel in Russia. Building better
storage will cost an additional $5 million. About 60 percent of that amount
has been pledged by donor countries, but dismantling the facility will
cost some $60 million.
For Serbia's science minister, Aleksandar Popovic, the 2002 operation
to remove the weapons-grade fuel has left the job only half done.
He told The Associated Press he was "very unhappy" that help has not
materialized for the other half.
"Once the spent fuel is gone, I'll be one happy guy," he said.